[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1075ba53-91ed-2138-89b3-60fbfbd80b57@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:18:45 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@...italocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <vpillai@...italocean.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@...il.com>,
Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@...italocean.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kerr <kerrnel@...gle.com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@...il.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4
BTW Joel,
Did you guys have a chance to try out v5 core scheduler?
> - Joel(ChromeOS) found a deadlock and crash on PREEMPT kernel in the
> coreshed idle balance logic
We did some patches to fix a few stability issues in v4. I wonder
if v5 still has the deadlock that you saw before?
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists