[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200317213100.GH15609@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:31:14 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Shutemov, Kirill" <kirill.shutemov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted"
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:24:59PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> No, there are just two states. I just think the "!encrypted" case
> should not be called "decrypted".
Yeah, we suck at naming - news at 11! :-)
I believe we even considered things like "encrypted" vs "clear" but
that sucked too. ;-\
In any case, that ship has sailed now and having two as differently as
possible looking words to denote the two "states" should be good enough
for our purposes...
Oh well.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists