[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200317222846.GI20788@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 22:28:47 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: 韩科才 <hankecai@...o.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, broonie@...nel.org,
alexios.zavras@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, allison@...utok.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...o.com, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: fix spelling mistake "ca not" -> "cannot"
On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 12:01:19PM +0800, 韩科才 wrote:
> There is a spelling mistake in the comment, Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: hankecai <hankecai@...tel.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/lib/strcmp.S | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/strcmp.S b/arch/arm64/lib/strcmp.S
> index 4767540d1b94..4e79566726c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/strcmp.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/strcmp.S
> @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ CPU_LE( rev data2, data2 )
> * as carry-propagation can corrupt the upper bits if the trailing
> * bytes in the string contain 0x01.
> * However, if there is no NUL byte in the dword, we can generate
> - * the result directly. We ca not just subtract the bytes as the
> + * the result directly. We cannot just subtract the bytes as the
> * MSB might be significant.
> */
> CPU_BE( cbnz has_nul, 1f )
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists