linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Fix putting invalid cpu clk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200317064152.GB12791@e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:41:52 +0000
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anders.roxell@...aro.org,
        arnd@...db.de, sboyd@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        naresh.kamboju@...aro.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        Basil.Eljuse@....com, mturquette@...libre.com,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch_topology: Fix putting invalid cpu clk

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:33:08PM +0800, Jeffy Chen wrote:
> Add a sanity check before putting the cpu clk.
> 
> Fixes: b8fe128dad8f (“arch_topology: Adjust initial CPU capacities with current freq")


Interesting, I had NACKed the original patch in v1 IIRC.
I was against for adding clk into arch topology as not all platform
control CPUFreq via clk APIs. Anyways, as fix this makes sense, but
I need to take a look and find ways to remove it if possible, but that's
for some other time.

--
Regards,
Sudeep