[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <add27a04-e018-d050-4d42-4fb5c532df8c@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:17:05 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@...il.com>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
greg.tu@...esyslogic.com.tw, ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] mmc: host: Add UHS-II support in host layer
On 9/01/20 11:14 am, Ben Chuang wrote:
> From: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>
>
> Add UHS-II support in host layer
Split host layer changes from sdhci changes.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Drop "Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>"
> Signed-off-by: Ben Chuang <ben.chuang@...esyslogic.com.tw>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/mmc/host/{sdhci.c => sdhci-core.c} | 276 ++++++--
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-milbeaut.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-at91.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav3.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.c | 751 +++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.h | 34 +
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon.c | 4 +-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 284 +++++++-
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/mmc/uhs2.h | 270 ++++++++
> 14 files changed, 1583 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> rename drivers/mmc/host/{sdhci.c => sdhci-core.c} (94%)
> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-uhs2.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/mmc/uhs2.h
Please make sdhci-uhs2 a module and do not rename sdhci.c.
References in sdhci.c to sdhci-uhs2.c will need to be enclosed by
#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_SDHCI_UHS2)
Move all UHS-II definitions into sdhci-uhs2.h. Things that are for V4 but
not necessarily UHS-II can be in sdhci.h
Make the set_power parameter change into a separate patch
Fix all spelling mistakes
Make comment style correct.
Review all checkpatch warnings and checks (i.e. --strict option)
If possible provide a link to a tree that contains the patches.
Re-base on Ulf's next branch
The patch set could use an overview of how UHS-II is different from regular SD.
In other patches there are a bunch of memory allocations on the I/O path.
That is a problem. Memory needed should be allocated in advance.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists