[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yrjhlfnzcrmd.fsf@pohly-mobl1.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:28:26 +0100
From: "Patrick Ohly" <patrick.ohly@...el.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, virtio-fs@...hat.com, miklos@...redi.hu,
stefanha@...hat.com, dgilbert@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] virtiofs: Add DAX support
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> We expect users will issue fsync/msync like a regular filesystem to
> make changes persistent. So in that aspect, rejecting MAP_SYNC
> makes sense. I will test and see if current code is rejecting MAP_SYNC
> or not.
Last time I checked, it did. Here's the test program that I wrote for
that:
https://github.com/intel/pmem-csi/blob/ee3200794a1ade49a02df6f359a134115b409e90/test/cmd/pmem-dax-check/main.go
--
Best Regards
Patrick Ohly
Powered by blists - more mailing lists