[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVwbGNOWk+MK-XZSrSMY3nNnn0sfJ0UZFXaZgQh-tQDZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:48:08 +0100
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Harish Jenny K N <harish_kandiga@...tor.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Phil Reid <preid@...ctromag.com.au>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] gpiolib: Add support for GPIO line table lookup
Hi Linus,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:21 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 4:18 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> > Currently GPIOs can only be referred to by GPIO controller and offset in
> > GPIO lookup tables.
> >
> > Add support for looking them up by line name.
> > Rename gpiod_lookup.chip_label to gpiod_lookup.key, to make it clear
> > that this field can have two meanings, and update the kerneldoc and
> > GPIO_LOOKUP*() macros.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > Reviewed-by: Ulrich Hecht <uli+renesas@...nd.eu>
> > Reviewed-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
> > Tested-by: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
>
> I will try to understand why this change is necessary to implement
> the gpio aggregator (probablt I will comment that on the other
> patches like "aha now I see it" or so, but it would help a lot if the
> commit message
> would state the technical reason to why we need to do this change,
> like what it is that you want to do and why you cannot do it without
> this change.
It's very simple: how do you want the user to refer to a specific GPIO
line? Currently he can only do so by gpiochip label and index.
However, there exists another stable reference: the (optional) line name,
which can be attached using "gpio-line-names" in DT or ACPI.
As this is the most use-centric way to refer to a GPIO, it makes sense
to support lookup based on that, too.
Will reword to make this clearer.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists