[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mu8fdck6.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 01:56:09 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/switchtec: Fix init_completion race condition with poll_wait()
Logan,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com> writes:
> The call to init_completion() in mrpc_queue_cmd() can theoretically
> race with the call to poll_wait() in switchtec_dev_poll().
>
> poll() write()
> switchtec_dev_poll() switchtec_dev_write()
> poll_wait(&s->comp.wait); mrpc_queue_cmd()
> init_completion(&s->comp)
> init_waitqueue_head(&s->comp.wait)
just a nitpick. As you took the liberty to copy the description of the
race, which was btw. disovered by me, verbatim from a changelog written
by someone else w/o providing the courtesy of linking to that original
analysis, allow me the liberty to add the missing link:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200313174701.148376-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de
> To my knowledge, no one has hit this bug, but we should fix it for
> correctness.
s/,but we should fix/.Fix/ ?
> Fix this by using reinit_completion() instead of init_completion() in
> mrpc_queue_cmd().
>
> Fixes: 080b47def5e5 ("MicroSemi Switchtec management interface driver")
> Reported-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
@Bjorn: Can you please hold off on this for a few days until we sorted
out the remaining issues to avoid potential merge conflicts
vs. the completion series?
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists