linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL field

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e155d744-4433-b9a6-109f-f665316dd928@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 17 Mar 2020 18:59:40 +0800
From:   "yezhenyu (A)" <yezhenyu2@...wei.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC:     <mark.rutland@....com>, <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        <will@...nel.org>, <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <steven.price@....com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
        <guohanjun@...wei.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <arm@...nel.org>, <xiexiangyou@...wei.com>,
        <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] arm64: tlb: add support for TTL field

Hi Marc,

On 2020/3/11 17:12, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Zhenyu,
> 
> On 2020-03-11 02:53, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
>> ARMv8.4-TTL provides the TTL field in tlbi instruction to indicate
>> the level of translation table walk holding the leaf entry for the
>> address that is being invalidated. Hardware can use this information
>> to determine if there was a risk of splintering.
>>
>> This set of patches adds TTL field to __TLBI_ADDR, and uses
>> Architecture-specific MM context to pass the TTL value to tlb interface.
>>
>> The default value of TTL is 0, which will not have any impact on the
>> TLB maintenance instructions. The last patch trys to use TTL field in
>> some obviously tlb-flush interface.
> 
> I have already posted some support for ARMv8.4-TTL as part of my NV series [1],
> patches 62, 67, 68 and 69. This only deals with Stage-2 translation so far.
> If you intend to add Stage-1, please build on top of what I have already posted
> (I can extract the patches on a separate branch if you want).
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>         M.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org/

I have sent the PATCH v2 on 2020-03-12 [1]. Do you have any suggestion
for my code?  Is it appropriate to post my code based on your branch?

Looking forward to your suggestions.


Thanks,

	zhenyu

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/12/2