[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34627024-0f0c-f17e-a10a-f24327d28b76@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 13:27:40 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>
To: Sergey Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] tty: mips_ejtag_fdc: Mark expected switch
fall-through
On 10. 03. 20, 2:06, Sergey Semin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 05:12:40PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> On 06. 03. 20, 13:47, Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru wrote:
>>> From: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
>>>
>>> Mark mips_ejtag_fdc_encode() methods switch-case-4 as expecting to
>>> fall through.
>>>
>>> This patch fixes the following warning:
>>>
>>> drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c: In function ‘mips_ejtag_fdc_encode’:
>>> drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c:245:13: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
>>> word.word &= 0x00ffffff;
>>> ~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c:246:2: note: here
>>> case 3:
>>> ^~~~
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>
>>> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
>>> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c b/drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c
>>> index 620d8488b83e..21e76a2ec182 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/mips_ejtag_fdc.c
>>> @@ -243,6 +243,7 @@ static struct fdc_word mips_ejtag_fdc_encode(const char **ptrs,
>>> /* Fall back to a 3 byte encoding */
>>> word.bytes = 3;
>>> word.word &= 0x00ffffff;
>>> + /* Fall through */
>>
>> We now have "fallthrough;", so I believe you should use that instead of
>> comments.
>>
>
> Hello Jiri,
>
> Thanks for the comment. I didn't know about that new macro. Since Greg
> already pulled this patch in his tty-next branch, I won't send an
> update in the next patchset revision.
Hi, OK -- now there is a whole-tree conversion undergoing anyway, so I
think they will take care about this one too...
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists