[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18a2cb7a-0e4c-e2f2-e3ca-99a8ae85469d@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:43:10 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tiwai@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org,
vkoul@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jank@...ence.com,
slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: stream: only change state if needed
On 17/03/2020 12:22, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Hi Srinivas,
>
>> This patch did not work for me as it is as wsa881x codec does prepare
>> and enable in one function, which breaks some of the assumptions in
>> this patch.
>
> Ah yes, if two transitions happen in the same DAI callback that wouldn't
> work indeed. We should probably add this restriction to the state
> machine documentation, the suggested mapping from ASoC DAI states to
> stream states did not account for compound cases.
>
>> However with below change I could get it working without moving stream
>> handling to machine driver.
>
> The change below would be an error case for Intel, so it's probably
> better if we go with your suggestion. You have a very specific state
> handling due to your power amps and it's probably better to keep it
> platform-specific.
>
> Can you confirm though that this patch works fine if you move all the
> stream transitions to the machine driver? That should be a no-op but
> better make sure there's no misunderstanding.
yes, it works with this patch + moving wsa stream handing to machine driver.
--srini
>
> Thanks
> -Pierre
Powered by blists - more mailing lists