lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:46:35 +0200
From:   gilad kleinman <dkgs1998@...il.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/module: Fixed bug allowing invalid relocation addresses.

When you load a bad module and the kernel crashes -- the panic message
will usually be related to the module and easily traced back. If you
load a module with a bad relocation table (because of a bit-flip \ bad
toolchain), it will override other kernel code, resulting in an
impossible to trace back kernel panic.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 2:58 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 11:36:26PM +0200, Gilad Wharton Kleinman wrote:
> > If a kernel module with a bad relocation offset is loaded to a x86 kernel,
> > the kernel will apply the relocation to a address not inside the module
> > (resulting in memory in the kernel being overridden).
>
> Why !?
>
> If you load a bad module it's game over anyway. At best this protects us
> from broken toolchains.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ