lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:51:58 +0000
From:   Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "o.rempel@...gutronix.de" <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
CC:     "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
        Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Franck Lenormand <franck.lenormand@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/4] mailbox: imx: add SCU MU support

On 2020-03-04 7:56 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> i.MX8/8X SCU MU is dedicated for communication between SCU and Cortex-A
> cores from hardware design, and could not be reused for other purpose.
> 
> Per i.MX8/8X Reference mannual, Chapter "12.9.2.3.2 Messaging Examples",
>   Passing short messages: Transmit register(s) can be used to pass
>   short messages from one to four words in length. For example, when
>   a four-word message is desired, only one of the registers needs to
>   have its corresponding interrupt enable bit set at the receiver side;
>   the message’s first three words are written to the registers whose
>   interrupt is masked, and the fourth word is written to the other
>   register (which triggers an interrupt at the receiver side).
> 
> i.MX8/8X SCU firmware IPC is an implementation of passing short
> messages. But current imx-mailbox driver only support one word
> message, i.MX8/8X linux side firmware has to request four TX
> and four RX to support IPC to SCU firmware. This is low efficent
> and more interrupts triggered compared with one TX and
> one RX.
> 
> To make SCU MU work,
>    - parse the size of msg.
>    - Only enable TR0/RR0 interrupt for transmit/receive message.
>    - For TX/RX, only support one TX channel and one RX channel
>    - For RX, support receive msg larger than 4 u32 words.
>    - Support 6 channels, TX0/RX0/RXDB[0-3], not support TXDB.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> 
> V6:
>   Add R-b tag
>   Use %zu for printk sizeof
> 
> V5:
>   Code style cleanup
>   Add more debug msg
>   Drop __packed aligned
>   idx santity check in scu xlate
> 
> V4:
>   Added separate chans init and xlate function for SCU MU
>   Limit chans to TX0/RX0/RXDB[0-3], max 6 chans.
>   Santity check to msg size
> 
> V3:
>   Added scu type tx/rx and SCU MU type
> 
>   drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 134 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 134 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index df6c4ecd913c..0895ccd23d17 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>    */
>   
>   #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware/imx/ipc.h>
>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>   #include <linux/io.h>
>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
> @@ -27,6 +28,8 @@
>   #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIRn(x)	BIT(16 + (3 - (x)))
>   
>   #define IMX_MU_CHANS		16
> +/* TX0/RX0/RXDB[0-3] */
> +#define IMX_MU_SCU_CHANS	6
>   #define IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE	20
>   
>   enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> @@ -36,6 +39,11 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
>   	IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB,	/* Rx doorbell */
>   };
>   
> +struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max {
> +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg hdr;
> +	u32 data[7];
> +};
> +
>   struct imx_mu_con_priv {
>   	unsigned int		idx;
>   	char			irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
> @@ -134,6 +142,63 @@ static int imx_mu_generic_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static int imx_mu_scu_tx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> +			 struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp,
> +			 void *data)
> +{
> +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max *msg = data;
> +	u32 *arg = data;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	switch (cp->type) {
> +	case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> +		if (msg->hdr.size > sizeof(*msg)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The real message size can be different to
> +			 * struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max size
> +			 */
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "Exceed max msg size (%zu) on TX, got: %i\n", sizeof(*msg), msg->hdr.size);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < msg->hdr.size; i++) > +			imx_mu_write(priv, *arg++, priv->dcfg->xTR[i % 4]);

Need to poll for TE, otherwise for long messages we could overwrite TR0 
before SCU reads it.

> +
> +		imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);

Shouldn't TIE be armed ahead of writing? In theory SCU could read first 
register before loop above is over.

> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Send data on wrong channel type: %d\n", cp->type);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_mu_scu_rx(struct imx_mu_priv *priv,
> +			 struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp)
> +{
> +	struct imx_sc_rpc_msg_max msg;
> +	u32 *data = (u32 *)&msg;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0));
> +	*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[0]);
> +
> +	if (msg.hdr.size > sizeof(msg)) {
> +		dev_err(priv->dev, "Exceed max msg size (%zu) on RX, got: %i\n",
> +			sizeof(msg), msg.hdr.size);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 1; i < msg.hdr.size; i++)
> +		*data++ = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[i % 4]);

Shouldn't you poll for !RE? It's possible to receive RX interrupt and 
start reading before other side writes the second word.

> +
> +	imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_RIEn(0), 0);
> +	mbox_chan_received_data(cp->chan, (void *)&msg);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static void imx_mu_txdb_tasklet(unsigned long data)
>   {
>   	struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = (struct imx_mu_con_priv *)data;
> @@ -263,6 +328,42 @@ static const struct mbox_chan_ops imx_mu_ops = {
>   	.shutdown = imx_mu_shutdown,
>   };
>   
> +static struct mbox_chan *imx_mu_scu_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
> +					  const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
> +{
> +	u32 type, idx, chan;
> +
> +	if (sp->args_count != 2) {
> +		dev_err(mbox->dev, "Invalid argument count %d\n", sp->args_count);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
> +
> +	type = sp->args[0]; /* channel type */
> +	idx = sp->args[1]; /* index */
> +
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
> +	case IMX_MU_TYPE_RX:
> +		if (idx != 0)
> +			dev_err(mbox->dev, "Invalid chan idx: %d\n", idx);
> +		chan = type;
> +		break;
> +	case IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB:
> +		chan = 2 + idx;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		dev_err(mbox->dev, "Invalid chan type: %d\n", type);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (chan >= mbox->num_chans) {
> +		dev_err(mbox->dev, "Not supported channel number: %d. (type: %d, idx: %d)\n", chan, type, idx);
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +	}
> +
> +	return &mbox->chans[chan];
> +}
> +
>   static struct mbox_chan * imx_mu_xlate(struct mbox_controller *mbox,
>   				       const struct of_phandle_args *sp)
>   {
> @@ -310,6 +411,28 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
>   	imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
>   }
>   
> +static void imx_mu_init_scu(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < IMX_MU_SCU_CHANS; i++) {
> +		struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = &priv->con_priv[i];
> +
> +		cp->idx = i < 2 ? 0 : i - 2;
> +		cp->type = i < 2 ? i : IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB;
> +		cp->chan = &priv->mbox_chans[i];
> +		priv->mbox_chans[i].con_priv = cp;
> +		snprintf(cp->irq_desc, sizeof(cp->irq_desc),
> +			 "imx_mu_chan[%i-%i]", cp->type, cp->idx);
> +	}
> +
> +	priv->mbox.num_chans = IMX_MU_SCU_CHANS;
> +	priv->mbox.of_xlate = imx_mu_scu_xlate;
> +
> +	/* Set default MU configuration */
> +	imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> +}
> +
>   static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -396,9 +519,20 @@ static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
>   	.xCR	= 0x64,
>   };
>   
> +static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu = {
> +	.tx	= imx_mu_scu_tx,
> +	.rx	= imx_mu_scu_rx,
> +	.init	= imx_mu_init_scu,
> +	.xTR	= {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
> +	.xRR	= {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
> +	.xSR	= 0x20,
> +	.xCR	= 0x24,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
>   	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
>   	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
> +	{ .compatible = "fsl,imx8-mu-scu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx8_scu },
>   	{ },
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists