linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v6 04/10] arm64: hyperv: Add memory alloc/free functions for Hyper-V size pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MW2PR2101MB1052D91D3A9CEEBD7E2EA82FD7F70@MW2PR2101MB1052.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 00:15:25 +0000
From:   Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-efi <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "marcelo.cerri@...onical.com" <marcelo.cerri@...onical.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@...rosoft.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 04/10] arm64: hyperv: Add memory alloc/free functions
 for Hyper-V size pages

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 1:33 AM
> 
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:30 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On 2020-03-16 08:22, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2020 at 4:36 PM Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >>  /*
> > >> + * Functions for allocating and freeing memory with size and
> > >> + * alignment HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE. These functions are needed because
> > >> + * the guest page size may not be the same as the Hyper-V page
> > >> + * size. We depend upon kmalloc() aligning power-of-two size
> > >> + * allocations to the allocation size boundary, so that the
> > >> + * allocated memory appears to Hyper-V as a page of the size
> > >> + * it expects.
> > >> + *
> > >> + * These functions are used by arm64 specific code as well as
> > >> + * arch independent Hyper-V drivers.
> > >> + */
> > >> +
> > >> +void *hv_alloc_hyperv_page(void)
> > >> +{
> > >> +       BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE <  HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE);
> > >> +       return kmalloc(HV_HYP_PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> > >> +}
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(hv_alloc_hyperv_page);
> > >
> > > I don't think there is any guarantee that kmalloc() returns
> > > page-aligned
> > > allocations in general.
> >
> > I believe that guarantee came with 59bb47985c1db ("mm, sl[aou]b:
> > guarantee
> > natural alignment for kmalloc(power-of-two)").
> >
> > > How about using get_free_pages() to implement this?
> >
> > This would certainly work, at the expense of a lot of wasted memory when
> > PAGE_SIZE isn't 4k.
> 
> I'm sure this is the least of your problems when the guest runs with
> a large base page size, you've already wasted most of your memory
> otherwise then.
> 

I think there's value in keeping these functions.  There are 8 uses in
architecture independent code at the moment, which admittedly saves
only ~1/2 Mbyte of memory with a 64K page size, but we will have
additional uses with more memory savings as we get all of the
Hyper-V synthetic drivers to work with 64K page size.  Furthermore,
there's coming work that will require additional steps to share a page
between a guest and the Hyper-V host.  These functions are the right
place to put the code for the additional sharing steps.  Removing them
now in favor of a bare kmalloc() and then adding them back doesn't
seem worthwhile.

Michael