lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB3600BF8115865C58A463FE37FFF70@VI1PR0402MB3600.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:02:22 +0000
From:   Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
To:     "Fuzzey, Martin" <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH 1/4] net: fec: set GPR bit on suspend by DT
 connfiguration.

From: Fuzzey, Martin <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 4:36 PM
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 at 07:26, Andy Duan <fugang.duan@....com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Martin Fuzzey <martin.fuzzey@...wbird.group> Sent: Wednesday,
> > March 18, 2020 12:50 AM
> > > +static int fec_enet_of_parse_stop_mode(struct fec_enet_private *fep,
> > > +                                      struct device_node *np) {
> > > +       static const char prop[] = "fsl,stop-mode";
> > > +       struct of_phandle_args args;
> > > +       int ret;
> > > +
> > > +       ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np, prop, 2, 0,
> > > + &args);
> > To save memory:
> >
> >                  ret = of_parse_phandle_with_fixed_args(np,
> > "fsl,stop-mode", 2, 0, &args);
> >
> 
> Why would this save memory?
> prop is defined static const char[] (and not char *) so there will no be extra
> pointers.
> 
> I haven't checked the generated assembler but this should generate the same
> code as a string litteral I think.
> 
> It is also reused later in the function in a debug (which is the reason I did it
> this way to ensure the property name is unique and consistent.

static variable cost memory and never is not freed if the module is built in. 

the later debug message cannot depend on the variable.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Martin
> 
> --

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ