| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:01:23 +0800
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, paolo.valente@...aro.org, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, arnd@...db.de, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
orsonzhai@...il.com, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/8] block: Allow sending a batch of requests
from the scheduler to hardware
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:01:19PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> As we know, some SD/MMC host controllers can support packed request,
> that means we can package several requests to host controller at one
> time to improve performence. So the hardware driver expects the blk-mq
> can dispatch a batch of requests at one time, and driver can use bd.last
> to indicate if it is the last request in the batch to help to combine
> requests as much as possible.
>
> Thus we should add batch requests setting from the block driver to tell
> the scheduler how many requests can be dispatched in a batch, as well
> as changing the scheduler to dispatch more than one request if setting
> the maximum batch requests number.
>
I feel this batch dispatch style is more complicated, and some other
drivers(virtio blk/scsi) still may get benefit if we can pass real 'last' flag in
.queue_rq().
So what about the following way by extending .commit_rqs() to this usage?
And you can do whatever batch processing in .commit_rqs() which will be
guaranteed to be called if BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS is set by driver.
diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index 856356b1619e..cd2bbe56f83f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -85,11 +85,12 @@ void blk_mq_sched_restart(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
* its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
* restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
*/
-static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
+ bool ret = false;
do {
struct request *rq;
@@ -112,7 +113,10 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
* in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list().
*/
list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
- } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+ ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true);
+ } while (ret);
+
+ return ret;
}
static struct blk_mq_ctx *blk_mq_next_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
@@ -131,11 +135,12 @@ static struct blk_mq_ctx *blk_mq_next_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
* its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
* restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
*/
-static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = READ_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from);
+ bool ret = false;
do {
struct request *rq;
@@ -161,10 +166,12 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
/* round robin for fair dispatch */
ctx = blk_mq_next_ctx(hctx, rq->mq_ctx);
-
- } while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+ ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true);
+ } while (ret);
WRITE_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from, ctx);
+
+ return ret;
}
void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -173,6 +180,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.dispatch_request;
LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
+ bool dispatch_ret;
/* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(q)))
@@ -206,20 +214,26 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
- if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false)) {
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+ if (dispatch_ret) {
if (has_sched_dispatch)
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
else
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
}
} else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
} else if (hctx->dispatch_busy) {
/* dequeue request one by one from sw queue if queue is busy */
- blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
} else {
blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
- blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+ dispatch_ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+ }
+
+ if (dispatch_ret) {
+ if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS)
+ hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
}
}
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 87c6699f35ae..9b46f5d6c7fd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1238,11 +1238,15 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
* Flag last if we have no more requests, or if we have more
* but can't assign a driver tag to it.
*/
- if (list_empty(list))
- bd.last = true;
- else {
- nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
- bd.last = !blk_mq_get_driver_tag(nxt);
+ if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS)) {
+ if (list_empty(list))
+ bd.last = true;
+ else {
+ nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
+ bd.last = !blk_mq_get_driver_tag(nxt);
+ }
+ } else {
+ bd.last = false;
}
ret = q->mq_ops->queue_rq(hctx, &bd);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 07fa767bff86..c0ef6990b698 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ enum {
BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE = 1 << 0,
BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED = 1 << 1,
BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ = 1 << 2,
+ BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS = 1 << 3,
BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING = 1 << 5,
BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED = 1 << 6,
BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,
Thanks,
Ming
Powered by blists - more mailing lists