linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: sprd: cleanup the sprd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:13:40 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>
Cc:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] serial: sprd: cleanup the sprd_port for error case

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 06:06:05PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 5:16 PM Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 4:31 PM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > >
> > > It would be better to cleanup the sprd_port for the device before
> > > return error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c | 4 +++-
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c
> > > index 9f8c14ff6454..54477de9822f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sprd_serial.c
> > > @@ -1204,8 +1204,10 @@ static int sprd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >         up->has_sysrq = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SERIAL_SPRD_CONSOLE);
> > >
> > >         ret = sprd_clk_init(up);
> > > -       if (ret)
> > > +       if (ret) {
> > > +               sprd_port[index] = NULL;
> >
> > 如果我们强制使用alias, 则这里应该也无需清除了，因为一进probe就会给它重新赋值。 还是我漏了什么？
> 
> Sorry, please ignore my previsous comment. I made a stupid mistake
> when talking with Chunyan.
> 
> So what I mean is we should not add this clean up, cause we will
> always get the correct index with aliases, and it will be overlapped
> when probing again.

So ignore this patch and only take patch 1/2?  If so, can I get your
acked-by for it?

thanks,

greg k-h