[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200318102810.GA2172609@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 11:28:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 2/6] stm class: sys-t: Fix the use of time_after()
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> The operands of time_after() are in a wrong order in both instances in
> the sys-t driver. Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 39f10239df75 ("stm class: p_sys-t: Add support for CLOCKSYNC packets")
> Fixes: d69d5e83110f ("stm class: Add MIPI SyS-T protocol support")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v4.20+
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/stm/p_sys-t.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
This should go to 5.6-final, right?
Don't mix and match patches in a series if possible...
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists