[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0844ce2d-ded7-de30-c1ef-6e4de79c556d@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 17:14:27 +0530
From: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: acme@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, mpe@...erman.id.au,
sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com, jmario@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...nel.org,
paulus@...abs.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mpetlan@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
mamatha4@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure
to handle "?"
On 3/17/20 8:37 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:53:31AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
>> index 3b4cdfc5efd6..dcc3c6ab2e67 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/header.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
>> #include <string.h>
>> #include <linux/stringify.h>
>> #include "header.h"
>> +#include "metricgroup.h"
>> +#include <api/fs/fs.h>
>>
>> #define mfspr(rn) ({unsigned long rval; \
>> asm volatile("mfspr %0," __stringify(rn) \
>> @@ -16,6 +18,8 @@
>> #define PVR_VER(pvr) (((pvr) >> 16) & 0xFFFF) /* Version field */
>> #define PVR_REV(pvr) (((pvr) >> 0) & 0xFFFF) /* Revison field */
>>
>> +#define SOCKETS_INFO_FILE_PATH "/devices/hv_24x7/interface/sockets"
>> +
>> int
>> get_cpuid(char *buffer, size_t sz)
>> {
>> @@ -44,3 +48,9 @@ get_cpuid_str(struct perf_pmu *pmu __maybe_unused)
>>
>> return bufp;
>> }
>> +
>> +int arch_get_runtimeparam(void)
>> +{
>> + int count;
>> + return sysfs__read_int(SOCKETS_INFO_FILE_PATH, &count) < 0 ? 1 : count;
>
> is that SOCKETS_INFO_FILE_PATH define used later? if not please
> put the path directly as an argument to sysfs__read_int
>
Ok will do that.
Thanks,
Kajol
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists