[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200318114837.159978-1-shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:48:37 +0800
From: Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH] include/linux: fix some typos
s/Not/Note/
Signed-off-by: Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
include/linux/list_nulls.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/once.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/list_nulls.h b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
index fa6e8471bd22..c845761fe5de 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_nulls_value(const struct hlist_nulls_node *ptr)
* hlist_nulls_unhashed - Has node been removed and reinitialized?
* @h: Node to be checked
*
- * Not that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
+ * Note that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
* For example, hlist_del_init_rcu() leaves the node in unhashed state,
* but hlist_nulls_del() does not.
*/
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static inline int hlist_nulls_unhashed(const struct hlist_nulls_node *h)
* hlist_nulls_unhashed_lockless - Has node been removed and reinitialized?
* @h: Node to be checked
*
- * Not that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
+ * Note that not all removal functions will leave a node in unhashed state.
* For example, hlist_del_init_rcu() leaves the node in unhashed state,
* but hlist_nulls_del() does not. Unlike hlist_nulls_unhashed(), this
* function may be used locklessly.
diff --git a/include/linux/once.h b/include/linux/once.h
index 9225ee6d96c7..095c6debd63b 100644
--- a/include/linux/once.h
+++ b/include/linux/once.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ void __do_once_done(bool *done, struct static_key_true *once_key,
* out the condition into a nop. DO_ONCE() guarantees type safety of
* arguments!
*
- * Not that the following is not equivalent ...
+ * Note that the following is not equivalent ...
*
* DO_ONCE(func, arg);
* DO_ONCE(func, arg);
--
2.24.0.rc2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists