[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200318121417.GB849721@krava>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:14:17 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
Cc: acme@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, mathieu.poirier@...aro.org,
ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com, alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com,
vitaly.slobodskoy@...el.com, pavel.gerasimov@...el.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, eranian@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 10/17] perf tools: Save previous sample for LBR
stitching approach
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 11:33:12AM -0700, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
SNIP
> + struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch;
> };
>
> struct machine;
> @@ -145,4 +151,14 @@ static inline bool thread__is_filtered(struct thread *thread)
> return false;
> }
>
> +static inline void thread__free_stitch_list(struct thread *thread)
> +{
> + struct lbr_stitch *lbr_stitch = thread->lbr_stitch;
> +
> + if (!lbr_stitch)
> + return;
> +
> + free(thread->lbr_stitch);
> +}
free(thread->lbr_stitch) should be enough
jirka
> +
> #endif /* __PERF_THREAD_H */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists