linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] binderfs: port to new mount api

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:29:51 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc:     tkjos@...roid.com, keescook@...omium.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
        ardb@...nel.org, arve@...roid.com, hridya@...gle.com,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        maco@...roid.com, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org, shuah@...nel.org,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binderfs: port to new mount api

On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:34:27PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> When I first wrote binderfs the new mount api had not yet landed. Now
> that it has been around for a little while and a bunch of filesystems
> have already been ported we should do so too. When Al sent his
> mount-api-conversion pr he requested that binderfs (and a few others) be
> ported separately. It's time we port binderfs. We can make use of the
> new option parser, get nicer infrastructure and it will be easier if we
> ever add any new mount options.
> 
> This survives testing with the binderfs selftests:
> 
> for i in `seq 1 1000`; do ./binderfs_test; done
> 
> including the new stress tests I sent out for review today:

<snip>

Thanks for these, all now queued up.

greg k-h