[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200318122951.GA2583829@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 13:29:51 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
Cc: tkjos@...roid.com, keescook@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org,
ardb@...nel.org, arve@...roid.com, hridya@...gle.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
maco@...roid.com, naresh.kamboju@...aro.org, shuah@...nel.org,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binderfs: port to new mount api
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 04:34:27PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> When I first wrote binderfs the new mount api had not yet landed. Now
> that it has been around for a little while and a bunch of filesystems
> have already been ported we should do so too. When Al sent his
> mount-api-conversion pr he requested that binderfs (and a few others) be
> ported separately. It's time we port binderfs. We can make use of the
> new option parser, get nicer infrastructure and it will be easier if we
> ever add any new mount options.
>
> This survives testing with the binderfs selftests:
>
> for i in `seq 1 1000`; do ./binderfs_test; done
>
> including the new stress tests I sent out for review today:
<snip>
Thanks for these, all now queued up.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists