linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 14/15] powerpc/watchpoint/xmon: Don't allow breakpoint overwriting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:07:37 +0530
From:   Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:     mpe@...erman.id.au, mikey@...ling.org, apopple@...ux.ibm.com,
        paulus@...ba.org, npiggin@...il.com,
        naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
        jolsa@...nel.org, oleg@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        mingo@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] powerpc/watchpoint/xmon: Don't allow breakpoint
 overwriting



On 3/17/20 4:40 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> 
> 
> Le 09/03/2020 à 09:58, Ravi Bangoria a écrit :
>> Xmon allows overwriting breakpoints because it's supported by only
>> one dawr. But with multiple dawrs, overwriting becomes ambiguous
>> or unnecessary complicated. So let's not allow it.
> 
> Could we drop this completely (I mean the functionnality, not the patch).

Not sure I follow. Isn't the same thing I'm doing?

-Ravi