[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.21.99999.375.2003181857010.54051@wambui>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:02:47 +0300 (EAT)
From: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>
To: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>, airlied@...ux.ie,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
cc: daniel@...ll.ch
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] drm/vram-helper: make drm_vram_mm_debugfs_init()
return 0
On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 04:31:14PM +0300, Wambui Karuga wrote:
>> Since 987d65d01356 (drm: debugfs: make
>> drm_debugfs_create_files() never fail), drm_debugfs_create_files() never
>> fails and should return void. Therefore, remove its use as the
>> return value of drm_vram_mm_debugfs_init(), and have the function
>> return 0 directly.
>>
>> v2: have drm_vram_mm_debugfs_init() return 0 instead of void to avoid
>> introducing build issues and build breakage.
>>
>> References: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2020-February/257183.html
>> Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <wambui.karugax@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 10 ++++------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> index 92a11bb42365..c8bcc8609650 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c
>> @@ -1048,14 +1048,12 @@ static const struct drm_info_list drm_vram_mm_debugfs_list[] = {
>> */
>> int drm_vram_mm_debugfs_init(struct drm_minor *minor)
>> {
>> - int ret = 0;
>> -
>> #if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
>
> Just noticed that this #if here is not needed, we already have a dummy
> function for that case. Care to write a quick patch to remove it? On top
> of this patch series here ofc, I'm in the processing of merging the entire
> pile.
>
> Thanks, Daniel
Hi Daniel,
Without this check here, and compiling without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, this
function is run and the drm_debugfs_create_files() does not have access to
the parameters also protected by an #if above this function. So the change
throws an error for me. Is that correct?
Thanks,
wambui karuga
>> - ret = drm_debugfs_create_files(drm_vram_mm_debugfs_list,
>> - ARRAY_SIZE(drm_vram_mm_debugfs_list),
>> - minor->debugfs_root, minor);
>> + drm_debugfs_create_files(drm_vram_mm_debugfs_list,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(drm_vram_mm_debugfs_list),
>> + minor->debugfs_root, minor);
>> #endif
>> - return ret;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_vram_mm_debugfs_init);
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists