[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c01f0bae24856e4139c551ca07b9581424aa995.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 09:43:49 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: drm_vm: Use fallthrough;
On Wed, 2020-03-18 at 14:49 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:13:29PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-03-17 at 17:48 +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:17:12PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Convert /* fallthrough */ style comments to fallthrough;
> > > >
> > > > Convert the various uses of fallthrough comments to fallthrough;
> > > >
> > > > Done via script
> > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b56602fcf79f849e733e7b521bb0e17895d390fa.1582230379.git.joe@perches.com/
> > > >
> > > > And by hand:
> > > >
> > > > This file has a fallthrough comment outside of an #ifdef block
> > > > that causes gcc to emit a warning if converted in-place.
> > > >
> > > > So move the new fallthrough; inside the containing #ifdef/#endif too.
[]
> > > I'm assuming this all lands through a special pull? Or should I apply
> > > this?
[]
> > I think you should apply this.
> >
> > The idea here is to allow a scripted conversion at some
> > point and this patch is necessary to avoid new compiler
> > warnings after running the script.
>
> Ok, put into the queue but missed the 5.7 feature freeze for drm so 5.8
> probably.
Thanks, no worries.
Any scripted conversion like this isn't a high priority.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists