[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c3a4d9b-b213-dfc0-2857-a975e9c20770@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:11:28 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Liran Alon <liran.alon@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
John Haxby <john.haxby@...cle.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] KVM: nVMX: Don't flush TLB on nested VM
transition with EPT enabled
On 18/03/20 18:02, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> So something like this?
>
> if (!nested_ept)
> kvm_mmu_new_cr3(vcpu, cr3, enable_ept ||
> nested_cpu_has_vpid(vmcs12));
... which is exactly nested_has_guest_tlb_tag(vcpu). Well, not exactly
but it's a bug in your code above. :)
It completely makes sense to use that as the third argument, and while a
comment is still needed it will be much smaller.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists