| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200318021816.GA19758@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 10:18:16 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Enrico Weigelt <info@...ux.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf symbols: Consolidate symbol fixup issue
Hi Arnaldo, Jiri,
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 09:57:58AM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> After copying Arm64's perf archive with object files and perf.data file
> to x86 laptop, the x86's perf kernel symbol resolution fails. It
> outputs 'unknown' for all symbols parsing.
>
> This issue is root caused by the function elf__needs_adjust_symbols(),
> x86 perf tool uses one weak version, Arm64 (and powerpc) has rewritten
> their own version. elf__needs_adjust_symbols() decides if need to parse
> symbols with the relative offset address; but x86 building uses the weak
> function which misses to check for the elf type 'ET_DYN', so that it
> cannot parse symbols in Arm DSOs due to the wrong result from
> elf__needs_adjust_symbols().
>
> The DSO parsing should not depend on any specific architecture perf
> building; e.g. x86 perf tool can parse Arm and Arm64 DSOs, vice versa.
> And confirmed by Naveen N. Rao that powerpc64 kernels are not being
> built as ET_DYN anymore and change to ET_EXEC.
>
> This patch removes the arch specific functions for Arm64 and powerpc and
> changes elf__needs_adjust_symbols() as a common function.
>
> In the common elf__needs_adjust_symbols(), it checks an extra condition
> 'ET_DYN' for elf header type. With this fixing, the Arm64 DSO can be
> parsed properly with x86's perf tool.
>
> Before:
>
> # perf script
> main 3258 1 branches: 0 [unknown] ([unknown]) => ffff800010c4665c [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c46670 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eaec [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eaec [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eb00 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eb08 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4e780 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4e7a0 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eeac [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eebc [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4ed80 [unknown] ([kernel.kallsyms])
>
> After:
>
> # perf script
> main 3258 1 branches: 0 [unknown] ([unknown]) => ffff800010c4665c coresight_timeout+0x54 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c46670 coresight_timeout+0x68 ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eaec etm4_enable_hw+0x3cc ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eaec etm4_enable_hw+0x3cc ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eb00 etm4_enable_hw+0x3e0 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eb08 etm4_enable_hw+0x3e8 ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4e780 etm4_enable_hw+0x60 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4e7a0 etm4_enable_hw+0x80 ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4eeac etm4_enable+0x2d4 ([kernel.kallsyms])
> main 3258 1 branches: ffff800010c4eebc etm4_enable+0x2e4 ([kernel.kallsyms]) => ffff800010c4ed80 etm4_enable+0x1a8 ([kernel.kallsyms])
>
> v3: Changed to check for ET_DYN across all architectures.
>
> v2: Fixed Arm64 and powerpc native building.
>
> Reported-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Could you help review this patch?
I'd like to sell this patch with two scenarios: either when work on Arm
embedded system or work on Arm server (but the server is located in
the remote lab), if we copy the related perf data to our local x86_64
PC, this patch can be useful for our development and cross analysis.
Thanks,
Leo
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build | 1 -
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/sym-handling.c | 19 -------------------
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build | 1 -
> tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c | 10 ----------
> tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/sym-handling.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> index 0a7782c61209..789956f76d85 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/Build
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
> perf-y += header.o
> perf-y += perf_regs.o
> -perf-y += sym-handling.o
> perf-$(CONFIG_DWARF) += dwarf-regs.o
> perf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND) += unwind-libunwind.o
> perf-$(CONFIG_LIBDW_DWARF_UNWIND) += unwind-libdw.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/sym-handling.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/sym-handling.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 8dfa3e5229f1..000000000000
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/sym-handling.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
> -// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> -/*
> - *
> - * Copyright (C) 2015 Naveen N. Rao, IBM Corporation
> - */
> -
> -#include "symbol.h" // for the elf__needs_adjust_symbols() prototype
> -#include <stdbool.h>
> -
> -#ifdef HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> -#include <gelf.h>
> -
> -bool elf__needs_adjust_symbols(GElf_Ehdr ehdr)
> -{
> - return ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC ||
> - ehdr.e_type == ET_REL ||
> - ehdr.e_type == ET_DYN;
> -}
> -#endif
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build
> index 7cf0b8803097..e5c9504f8586 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
> perf-y += header.o
> -perf-y += sym-handling.o
> perf-y += kvm-stat.o
> perf-y += perf_regs.o
> perf-y += mem-events.o
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
> index abb7a12d8f93..0856b32f9e08 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/sym-handling.c
> @@ -10,16 +10,6 @@
> #include "probe-event.h"
> #include "probe-file.h"
>
> -#ifdef HAVE_LIBELF_SUPPORT
> -bool elf__needs_adjust_symbols(GElf_Ehdr ehdr)
> -{
> - return ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC ||
> - ehdr.e_type == ET_REL ||
> - ehdr.e_type == ET_DYN;
> -}
> -
> -#endif
> -
> int arch__choose_best_symbol(struct symbol *syma,
> struct symbol *symb __maybe_unused)
> {
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> index 1965aefccb02..be5b493f8284 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/symbol-elf.c
> @@ -704,9 +704,15 @@ void symsrc__destroy(struct symsrc *ss)
> close(ss->fd);
> }
>
> -bool __weak elf__needs_adjust_symbols(GElf_Ehdr ehdr)
> +bool elf__needs_adjust_symbols(GElf_Ehdr ehdr)
> {
> - return ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC || ehdr.e_type == ET_REL;
> + /*
> + * Usually vmlinux is an ELF file with type ET_EXEC for most
> + * architectures; except Arm64 kernel is linked with option
> + * '-share', so need to check type ET_DYN.
> + */
> + return ehdr.e_type == ET_EXEC || ehdr.e_type == ET_REL ||
> + ehdr.e_type == ET_DYN;
> }
>
> int symsrc__init(struct symsrc *ss, struct dso *dso, const char *name,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists