linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 5/8] hv_balloon: don't check for memhp_auto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200319131221.14044-6-david@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:12:18 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/8] hv_balloon: don't check for memhp_auto_online manually

We get the MEM_ONLINE notifier call if memory is added right from the
kernel via add_memory() or later from user space.

Let's get rid of the "ha_waiting" flag - the wait event has an inbuilt
mechanism (->done) for that. Initialize the wait event only once and
reinitialize before adding memory. Unconditionally call complete() and
wait_for_completion_timeout().

If there are no waiters, complete() will only increment ->done - which
will be reset by reinit_completion(). If complete() has already been
called, wait_for_completion_timeout() will not wait.

There is still the chance for a small race between concurrent
reinit_completion() and complete(). If complete() wins, we would not
wait - which is tolerable (and the race exists in current code as well).

Note: We only wait for "some" memory to get onlined, which seems to be
      good enough for now.

Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
index a02ce43d778d..32e3bc0aa665 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c
@@ -533,7 +533,6 @@ struct hv_dynmem_device {
 	 * State to synchronize hot-add.
 	 */
 	struct completion  ol_waitevent;
-	bool ha_waiting;
 	/*
 	 * This thread handles hot-add
 	 * requests from the host as well as notifying
@@ -634,10 +633,7 @@ static int hv_memory_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
 	switch (val) {
 	case MEM_ONLINE:
 	case MEM_CANCEL_ONLINE:
-		if (dm_device.ha_waiting) {
-			dm_device.ha_waiting = false;
-			complete(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
-		}
+		complete(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
 		break;
 
 	case MEM_OFFLINE:
@@ -726,8 +722,7 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
 		has->covered_end_pfn +=  processed_pfn;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dm_device.ha_lock, flags);
 
-		init_completion(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
-		dm_device.ha_waiting = !memhp_auto_online;
+		reinit_completion(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
 
 		nid = memory_add_physaddr_to_nid(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn));
 		ret = add_memory(nid, PFN_PHYS((start_pfn)),
@@ -753,15 +748,14 @@ static void hv_mem_hot_add(unsigned long start, unsigned long size,
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * Wait for the memory block to be onlined when memory onlining
-		 * is done outside of kernel (memhp_auto_online). Since the hot
-		 * add has succeeded, it is ok to proceed even if the pages in
-		 * the hot added region have not been "onlined" within the
-		 * allowed time.
+		 * Wait for memory to get onlined. If the kernel onlined the
+		 * memory when adding it, this will return directly. Otherwise,
+		 * it will wait for user space to online the memory. This helps
+		 * to avoid adding memory faster than it is getting onlined. As
+		 * adding succeeded, it is ok to proceed even if the memory was
+		 * not onlined in time.
 		 */
-		if (dm_device.ha_waiting)
-			wait_for_completion_timeout(&dm_device.ol_waitevent,
-						    5*HZ);
+		wait_for_completion_timeout(&dm_device.ol_waitevent, 5 * HZ);
 		post_status(&dm_device);
 	}
 }
@@ -1706,6 +1700,7 @@ static int balloon_probe(struct hv_device *dev,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
 	set_online_page_callback(&hv_online_page);
+	init_completion(&dm_device.ol_waitevent);
 	register_memory_notifier(&hv_memory_nb);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.24.1