[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319134710.GA4092809@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:47:10 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 01/65] gpiolib: Add support for the irqdomain which
doesnt use irq_fwspec as arg
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:33:55PM +0800, Kevin Hao wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit 242587616710576808dc8d7cdf18cfe0d7bf9831 ]
> >
> > Some gpio's parent irqdomain may not use the struct irq_fwspec as
> > argument, such as msi irqdomain. So rename the callback
> > populate_parent_fwspec() to populate_parent_alloc_arg() and make it
> > allocate and populate the specific struct which is needed by the
> > parent irqdomain.
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> This commit shouldn't go to stable because it is not a bug fix. It is just a
> prerequisite of switching to general GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP for thunderx gpio driver
> (commit 7a9f4460f74d "gpio: thunderx: Switch to GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP").
This seems to be a prerequisite for f98371476f36 ("pinctrl: qcom:
ssbi-gpio: Fix fwspec parsing bug") to apply properly. With that
information, is it ok to keep?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists