[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319145900.GC92193@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 15:59:00 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Hao <haokexin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.5 00/65] 5.5.11-rc1 review
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 07:44:33AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 3/19/20 6:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.5.11 release.
> > There are 65 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:37:04 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> arm:davinci_all_defconfig fails to build.
>
> include/linux/gpio/driver.h: In function 'gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_twocell':
> include/linux/gpio/driver.h:552:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
> 552 | }
>
> The problem is caused by commit 8db6a5905e98 ("gpiolib: Add support for the
> irqdomain which doesn't use irq_fwspec as arg") which is missing its fix,
> commit 9c6722d85e922 ("gpio: Fix the no return statement warning"). That one
> is missing a Fixes: tag, providing a good example why such tags are desirable.
Thanks for letting me know, I've now dropped that patch (others
complained about it for other reasons) and will push out a -rc2 with
that fix.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists