[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319120143.5ffed518@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:01:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: Use address-of operator on section symbols
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:27:11 -0700
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 7:33 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:00:04 -0700
> > Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Gentle ping for review/acceptance.
> >
> > Hmm, my local patchwork had this patch rejected. I'll go and apply it, run
>
> Local patchwork? As in patchwork.kernel.org? (Is there a client, or
> can you host your own instance?)
>
No, I went into a lot of effort to get it up and running on my own inbox.
I did this because I wasn't able to keep up with all the patches being sent
directly to me. It's a bit fragile, and the workflow mailing list is
working on ways to have this be a more general solution for maintainers.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists