[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1ba5c47-5a8f-f689-6d33-ec927f4268d8@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:42:42 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@...il.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
tglx@...utronix.de, broonie@...nel.org, corbet@....net,
mchehab+samsung@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] introduce read_poll_timeout
Le 2020-03-19 à 09:39, Dejin Zheng a écrit :
> This patch sets is introduce read_poll_timeout macro, it is an extension
> of readx_poll_timeout macro. the accessor function op just supports only
> one parameter in the readx_poll_timeout macro, but this macro can
> supports multiple variable parameters for it. so functions like
> phy_read(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 regnum) and
> phy_read_mmd(struct phy_device *phydev, int devad, u32 regnum) can
> use this poll timeout framework.
>
> the first patch introduce read_poll_timeout macro, and the second patch
> redefined readx_poll_timeout macro by read_poll_timeout(), and the other
> patches are examples using read_poll_timeout macro.
>
>
> Dejin Zheng (7):
> iopoll: introduce read_poll_timeout macro
> iopoll: redefined readx_poll_timeout macro to simplify the code
> net: phy: introduce phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout macro
> net: phy: bcm84881: use phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() to simplify the
> code
> net: phy: aquantia: use phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() to simplify the
> code
> net: phy: introduce phy_read_poll_timeout macro
> net: phy: use phy_read_poll_timeout() to simplify the code
>
> drivers/net/phy/aquantia_main.c | 16 +++++++--------
> drivers/net/phy/bcm84881.c | 24 ++++++----------------
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 18 ++++++-----------
> include/linux/iopoll.h | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/phy.h | 7 +++++++
> 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
Your diffstat is positive, so what's the point of doing this? What
problem are you trying to solve?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists