linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: phy: Document Samsung UFS PHY bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200319171210.GA14990@bogus>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:12:10 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, krzk@...nel.org, avri.altman@....com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, kwmad.kim@...sung.com,
        stanley.chu@...iatek.com, cang@...eaurora.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: phy: Document Samsung UFS PHY
 bindings

On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:41:40 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> This patch documents Samsung UFS PHY device tree bindings
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-phy.yaml         | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-phy.yaml
> 

My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:

/builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung,ufs-phy.example.dt.yaml: example-0: 'ufs-phy@...5571800' does not match any of the regexes: '.*-names$', '.*-supply$', '^#.*-cells$', '^#[a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}$', '^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}$', '^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}@[0-9a-fA-F]+(,[0-9a-fA-F]+)*$', '^__.*__$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1257427
Please check and re-submit.