lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319173326.oj4qs24x4ly5lrgt@treble>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 12:33:26 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 18 (objtool)

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:31:05PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> ... except the __builtin_trap() UD2 seems to be coming *after* the BUG
> UD2.  Could it be the BUG UD2 itself which is convincing UBSAN to add
> the __builtin_trap()?

Actually I suspect it's the __builtin_unreachable() annotation which is
making UBSAN add the __builtin_trap()...  because I don't see any double
UD2s for WARNs.

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ