[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319211956.GA3448@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:19:56 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH][next] firewire: core.h: Replace zero-length array with
flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
drivers/firewire/core.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core.h b/drivers/firewire/core.h
index 4b0e4ee655a1..71d5f16f311c 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/core.h
+++ b/drivers/firewire/core.h
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct fw_node {
/* Upper layer specific data. */
void *data;
- struct fw_node *ports[0];
+ struct fw_node *ports[];
};
static inline struct fw_node *fw_node_get(struct fw_node *node)
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists