linux-kernel - [PATCH][next] hwtracing: stm: stm.h: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200319214007.GA13640@embeddedor.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:40:07 -0500
From:   "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Cc:     linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Subject: [PATCH][next] hwtracing: stm: stm.h: Replace zero-length array with
 flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
---
 drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
index 3569439d53bb..a9be49fc7a6b 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/stm.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ void *stp_policy_node_priv(struct stp_policy_node *pn);
 
 struct stp_master {
 	unsigned int	nr_free;
-	unsigned long	chan_map[0];
+	unsigned long	chan_map[];
 };
 
 struct stm_device {
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct stm_device {
 	const struct config_item_type		*pdrv_node_type;
 	/* master allocation */
 	spinlock_t		mc_lock;
-	struct stp_master	*masters[0];
+	struct stp_master	*masters[];
 };
 
 #define to_stm_device(_d)				\
-- 
2.23.0