linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V3] UIO: make maximum memory and port regions configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7AF579E0012A4E4FA1B0EC683F4B7F591F96D26E@dggeml525-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 08:07:30 +0000
From:   "suqiang (C)" <suqiang4@...wei.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3] UIO: make maximum memory and port regions
 configurable

>What?  No, I did not review this, do not add a tag like that for a patch that I have not explicitly given it for.
A: Sorry, I misunderstood the means of the message.

>And how is the kbuild bot reporting problems that this patch fixes?
>Where is that report?
A: It's a stupid mistake beacause of my wrong git operation. Just ignore it please.

>Also, I want this to be dynamic, not static, please do that instead, no one rebuilds their kernels for something like this.
A: Yes, I got it. I will finish a dynamic implement and send a new patch. I had already sent the PACTH V3 before I read your previous email reply. Sorry for that.

thanks,
Qiang Su