lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200319083018.GB3489391@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:30:18 +0100
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>,
        Kaaira Gupta <kgupta@...iitr.ac.in>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the v4l-dvb
 tree

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 02:44:11PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/staging/media/allegro-dvt/allegro-core.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   cc62c74749a3 ("media: allegro: add missed checks in allegro_open()")
> 
> from the v4l-dvb tree and commit:
> 
>   e3d21cbfa978 ("staging: media: allegro: align with parenthesis")
> 
> from the staging tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Fix looks good, thanks!

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ