[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4a87ce6-9770-dc58-c2b6-e001b8050a8e@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:29:25 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] sched/topology: Kill SD_LOAD_BALANCE
On 11.03.20 19:15, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> That flag is set unconditionally in sd_init(), and no one checks for it
> anymore. Remove it.
Why not merge 3/9 and 4/9 ?
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched/topology.h b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> index f341163fedc9..8de2f9744569 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
> @@ -11,21 +11,20 @@
> */
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> -#define SD_LOAD_BALANCE 0x0001 /* Do load balancing on this domain. */
> -#define SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE 0x0002 /* Balance when about to become idle */
[...]
> -#define SD_OVERLAP 0x2000 /* sched_domains of this level overlap */
> -#define SD_NUMA 0x4000 /* cross-node balancing */
> +#define SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE 0x0001 /* Balance when about to become idle */
IMHO, changing the values of the remaining SD flags will break lots of
userspace scripts.
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists