linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Update feiyang, st7701 panel bindings converted as YAML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200319103159.GA18744@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:31:59 +0100
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] MAINTAINERS: Update feiyang, st7701 panel
 bindings converted as YAML

Hi Jagan.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:50:44PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:28 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 10:40:03PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > > The feiyang,fy07024di26a30d.txt and sitronix,st7701.txt has been
> > > converted to YAML schemas, update MAINTAINERS to match them again.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
> >
> > The patch is fine.
> > I just dislike we repeat the maintainer info in two places..
> 
> Since these are two different panels. and entry similar like other
> panels.do you look for single entry for both the panels?
My comment was related to the fact that we have maintainer entry in the
.yaml file, and in MAINTAINERS.

Seems a waste to have a distributed and a centralized place for this.
So patches are fine in this respect.
And merging the two bindings would be very bad, they are not alike.

	Sam