linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v3 00/10] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SDM845 and SC7180 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200319110805.glmuc2qvgcei3mon@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 16:38:05 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>, sboyd@...nel.org,
        georgi.djakov@...aro.org, saravanak@...gle.com, nm@...com,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org,
        david.brown@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, dianders@...omium.org, mka@...omium.org,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
        ulf.hansson@...aro.org, linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 00/10] DDR/L3 Scaling support on SDM845 and SC7180 SoCs

On 19-03-20, 16:23, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/19/2020 3:54 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I thought this series indeed is proposing to add that support in OPP core?
> a.k.a "[RFC v3 06/10] opp: Allow multiple opp_tables to be mapped to a single device"
> 
> These discussions are stalled for over 2 months now waiting on a response from Saravana.
> Viresh, whats the way forward here and how long do we plan on waiting for Saravanas response?

I agree and I am equally worried about it. So lets clear the air a bit
first. Can someone answer following :

- This series depends on the series from Saravana ? Right, so that
  needs to get merged/accepted first ?

- If yes, then what is the way forward as Saravana isn't responding
  right now ..

-- 
viresh