linux-kernel - [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:19:31 +0100
From:   Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Eric Richter <erichte@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>,
        Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
        Gustavo Luiz Duarte <gustavold@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Allison Randal <allison@...utok.net>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 3/8] powerpc/perf: consolidate read_user_stack_32

There are two almost identical copies for 32bit and 64bit.

The function is used only in 32bit code which will be split out in next
patch so consolidate to one function.

Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
---
v6:  new patch
v8:  move the consolidated function out of the ifdef block.
v11: rebase on top of def0bfdbd603
---
 arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
index cbc251981209..c9a78c6e4361 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/callchain.c
@@ -161,18 +161,6 @@ static int read_user_stack_64(unsigned long __user *ptr, unsigned long *ret)
 	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 8);
 }
 
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
-{
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	if (!probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret)))
-		return 0;
-
-	return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
-}
-
 static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 {
 	if (!sp || (sp & 7) || sp > (is_64 ? TASK_SIZE : 0x100000000UL) - 32)
@@ -277,19 +265,9 @@ static void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
 }
 
 #else  /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
-/*
- * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
- * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
- * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
- * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
- */
-static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+static int read_user_stack_slow(void __user *ptr, void *buf, int nb)
 {
-	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
-	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
-		return -EFAULT;
-
-	return probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static inline void perf_callchain_user_64(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry,
@@ -312,6 +290,28 @@ static inline int valid_user_sp(unsigned long sp, int is_64)
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
+/*
+ * On 32-bit we just access the address and let hash_page create a
+ * HPTE if necessary, so there is no need to fall back to reading
+ * the page tables.  Since this is called at interrupt level,
+ * do_page_fault() won't treat a DSI as a page fault.
+ */
+static int read_user_stack_32(unsigned int __user *ptr, unsigned int *ret)
+{
+	int rc;
+
+	if ((unsigned long)ptr > TASK_SIZE - sizeof(unsigned int) ||
+	    ((unsigned long)ptr & 3))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	rc = probe_user_read(ret, ptr, sizeof(*ret));
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC64) && rc)
+		return read_user_stack_slow(ptr, ret, 4);
+
+	return rc;
+}
+
 /*
  * Layout for non-RT signal frames
  */
-- 
2.23.0