[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200319123955.702270303@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:00:51 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 89/90] mm: slub: add missing TID bump in kmem_cache_alloc_bulk()
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
commit fd4d9c7d0c71866ec0c2825189ebd2ce35bd95b8 upstream.
When kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() attempts to allocate N objects from a percpu
freelist of length M, and N > M > 0, it will first remove the M elements
from the percpu freelist, then call ___slab_alloc() to allocate the next
element and repopulate the percpu freelist. ___slab_alloc() can re-enable
IRQs via allocate_slab(), so the TID must be bumped before ___slab_alloc()
to properly commit the freelist head change.
Fix it by unconditionally bumping c->tid when entering the slowpath.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: ebe909e0fdb3 ("slub: improve bulk alloc strategy")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/slub.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3115,6 +3115,15 @@ int kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(struct kmem_ca
if (unlikely(!object)) {
/*
+ * We may have removed an object from c->freelist using
+ * the fastpath in the previous iteration; in that case,
+ * c->tid has not been bumped yet.
+ * Since ___slab_alloc() may reenable interrupts while
+ * allocating memory, we should bump c->tid now.
+ */
+ c->tid = next_tid(c->tid);
+
+ /*
* Invoking slow path likely have side-effect
* of re-populating per CPU c->freelist
*/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists