linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 09/60] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200319123922.147166477@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:03:47 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
        Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 09/60] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for erase/trim/discard

From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

[ Upstream commit 43cc64e5221cc6741252b64bc4531dd1eefb733d ]

The busy timeout that is computed for each erase/trim/discard operation,
can become quite long and may thus exceed the host->max_busy_timeout. If
that becomes the case, mmc_do_erase() converts from using an R1B response
to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection.

However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no
matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note
that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of
managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other.

Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>
Tested-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@...com>
Tested-By: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index abf8f5eb0a1c8..26644b7ec13e3 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1732,8 +1732,11 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
 	 * the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should
 	 * use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy
 	 * detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead.
+	 * Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also means they are on their own
+	 * when it comes to deal with the busy timeout.
 	 */
-	if (card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
+	if (!(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) &&
+	    card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
 	    busy_timeout > card->host->max_busy_timeout) {
 		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
 	} else {
-- 
2.20.1