| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20200320182406.23465-4-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:23:46 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 03/23] irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure mutual exclusion between vPE affinity change and RD access
Before GICv4.1, all operations would be serialized with the affinity
changes by virtue of using the same ITS command queue. With v4.1, things
change, as invalidations (and a number of other operations) are issued
using the redistributor MMIO frame.
We must thus make sure that these redistributor accesses cannot race
against aginst the affinity change, or we may end-up talking to the
wrong redistributor.
To ensure this, we expand the irq_to_cpuid() helper to take a spinlock
when the LPI is mapped to a vLPI (a new per-VPE lock) on each operation
that requires mutual exclusion.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-4-maz@kernel.org
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h | 5 +++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
index da883a691028..1af713990123 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c
@@ -239,15 +239,41 @@ static struct its_vlpi_map *get_vlpi_map(struct irq_data *d)
return NULL;
}
-static int irq_to_cpuid(struct irq_data *d)
+static int vpe_to_cpuid_lock(struct its_vpe *vpe, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&vpe->vpe_lock, *flags);
+ return vpe->col_idx;
+}
+
+static void vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(struct its_vpe *vpe, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vpe->vpe_lock, flags);
+}
+
+static int irq_to_cpuid_lock(struct irq_data *d, unsigned long *flags)
{
- struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
struct its_vlpi_map *map = get_vlpi_map(d);
+ int cpu;
- if (map)
- return map->vpe->col_idx;
+ if (map) {
+ cpu = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(map->vpe, flags);
+ } else {
+ /* Physical LPIs are already locked via the irq_desc lock */
+ struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ cpu = its_dev->event_map.col_map[its_get_event_id(d)];
+ /* Keep GCC quiet... */
+ *flags = 0;
+ }
- return its_dev->event_map.col_map[its_get_event_id(d)];
+ return cpu;
+}
+
+static void irq_to_cpuid_unlock(struct irq_data *d, unsigned long flags)
+{
+ struct its_vlpi_map *map = get_vlpi_map(d);
+
+ if (map)
+ vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(map->vpe, flags);
}
static struct its_collection *valid_col(struct its_collection *col)
@@ -1329,7 +1355,9 @@ static void direct_lpi_inv(struct irq_data *d)
{
struct its_vlpi_map *map = get_vlpi_map(d);
void __iomem *rdbase;
+ unsigned long flags;
u64 val;
+ int cpu;
if (map) {
struct its_device *its_dev = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
@@ -1344,10 +1372,12 @@ static void direct_lpi_inv(struct irq_data *d)
}
/* Target the redistributor this LPI is currently routed to */
- rdbase = per_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist, irq_to_cpuid(d))->rd_base;
+ cpu = irq_to_cpuid_lock(d, &flags);
+ rdbase = per_cpu_ptr(gic_rdists->rdist, cpu)->rd_base;
gic_write_lpir(val, rdbase + GICR_INVLPIR);
wait_for_syncr(rdbase);
+ irq_to_cpuid_unlock(d, flags);
}
static void lpi_update_config(struct irq_data *d, u8 clr, u8 set)
@@ -3486,17 +3516,25 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
{
struct its_vpe *vpe = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
int from, cpu = cpumask_first(mask_val);
+ unsigned long flags;
/*
* Changing affinity is mega expensive, so let's be as lazy as
* we can and only do it if we really have to. Also, if mapped
* into the proxy device, we need to move the doorbell
* interrupt to its new location.
+ *
+ * Another thing is that changing the affinity of a vPE affects
+ * *other interrupts* such as all the vLPIs that are routed to
+ * this vPE. This means that the irq_desc lock is not enough to
+ * protect us, and that we must ensure nobody samples vpe->col_idx
+ * during the update, hence the lock below which must also be
+ * taken on any vLPI handling path that evaluates vpe->col_idx.
*/
- if (vpe->col_idx == cpu)
+ from = vpe_to_cpuid_lock(vpe, &flags);
+ if (from == cpu)
goto out;
- from = vpe->col_idx;
vpe->col_idx = cpu;
/*
@@ -3512,6 +3550,7 @@ static int its_vpe_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
out:
irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
+ vpe_to_cpuid_unlock(vpe, flags);
return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
}
@@ -3855,6 +3894,7 @@ static int its_vpe_init(struct its_vpe *vpe)
return -ENOMEM;
}
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&vpe->vpe_lock);
vpe->vpe_id = vpe_id;
vpe->vpt_page = vpt_page;
if (gic_rdists->has_rvpeid)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
index d9c34968467a..439963f4c66a 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v4.h
@@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ struct its_vpe {
};
};
+ /*
+ * Ensures mutual exclusion between affinity setting of the
+ * vPE and vLPI operations using vpe->col_idx.
+ */
+ raw_spinlock_t vpe_lock;
/*
* This collection ID is used to indirect the target
* redistributor for this VPE. The ID itself isn't involved in
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists