[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c03165c8-6d44-49c2-2dad-a85759200718@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:53:16 +0530
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Make pud_present() check _PAGE_PROTNONE and
_PAGE_PSE as well
On 03/18/2020 10:31 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> pud_present() should also check _PAGE_PROTNONE and _PAGE_PSE bits like in
> case pmd_present(). This makes a PUD entry test positive for pud_present()
> after getting invalidated with pud_mknotpresent(), hence standardizing the
> semantics with PMD helpers.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: x86@...nel.org
> Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> ---
> Even though pud_mknotpresent() is not used any where currently, there is
> a discrepancy between PMD and PUD.
>
> WARN_ON(!pud_present(pud_mknotpresent(pud_mkhuge(pud)))) -> Fail
> WARN_ON(!pmd_present(pmd_mknotpresent(pmd_mkhuge(pmd)))) -> Pass
>
> Though pud_mknotpresent() currently clears _PAGE_PROTNONE, pud_present()
> does not check it. This change fixes both inconsistencies.
>
> This has been build and boot tested on x86.
Adding Kirill and Dan.
+Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
+Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists