lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200320160545.26a65de3@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:05:45 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@...il.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: 4.19.106-rt44 -- boot problems with irqwork: push most work
 into softirq context

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 20:54:32 +0100
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:

> > Does this patch help?  
> 
> I don't think so. It also failed, and the failure seems to be
> identical to me.
> 
> https://gitlab.com/cip-project/cip-kernel/linux-cip/tree/ci/pavel/linux-cip
> https://lava.ciplatform.org/scheduler/job/13110
> 

Can you send me a patch that shows the difference between the revert that
you say works, and the upstream v4.19-rt tree (let me know which version
of v4.19-rt you are basing it on).

Thanks!

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ