[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200320222427.GG611@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 23:24:27 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/70] x86/sev-es: Add support for handling IOIO
exceptions
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:03:17PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > + if (exit_info_1 & IOIO_TYPE_STR) {
> > + int df = (regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_DF) ? -1 : 1;
> > [ ... ]
> > + if (!(exit_info_1 & IOIO_TYPE_IN)) {
> > + ret = vc_insn_string_read(ctxt,
> > + (void *)(es_base + regs->si),
> > + ghcb->shared_buffer, io_bytes,
> > + exit_info_2, df);
>
> The last argument to vc_insn_string_read() is "bool backwards" which in
> this case it appears will always be true?
Right, thanks, good catch, I'll fix this. Seems to be a leftover from a
previous version.
Regards,
Joerg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists