[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46bf21e2-bb3e-1c1e-8dae-2c5bd8c5274f@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 15:06:24 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Murphy <murphyt7@....ie>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] iommu/vt-d: Remove IOVA handling code from
non-dma_ops path
On 2020/3/20 14:30, Tom Murphy wrote:
> Could we merge patch 1-3 from this series? it just cleans up weird
> code and merging these patches will cover some of the work needed to
> move the intel iommu driver to the dma-iommu api in the future.
Can you please take a look at this patch series?
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/13/1162
It probably makes this series easier.
Best regards,
baolu
>
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 at 07:04, Tom Murphy<murphyt7@....ie> wrote:
>> Remove all IOVA handling code from the non-dma_ops path in the intel
>> iommu driver.
>>
>> There's no need for the non-dma_ops path to keep track of IOVAs. The
>> whole point of the non-dma_ops path is that it allows the IOVAs to be
>> handled separately. The IOVA handling code removed in this patch is
>> pointless.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Murphy<murphyt7@....ie>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists