[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <166f7f03-eda9-00a8-bd18-128898526313@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:50:56 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] drivers/base/memory: store mapping between MMOP_*
and string in an array
On 20.03.20 08:36, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 03/19/20 at 02:12pm, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> Let's use a simple array which we can reuse soon. While at it, move the
>> string->mmop conversion out of the device hotplug lock.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/memory.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/memory.c b/drivers/base/memory.c
>> index e7e77cafef80..8a7f29c0bf97 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/memory.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/memory.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,24 @@
>>
>> #define MEMORY_CLASS_NAME "memory"
>>
>> +static const char *const online_type_to_str[] = {
>> + [MMOP_OFFLINE] = "offline",
>> + [MMOP_ONLINE] = "online",
>> + [MMOP_ONLINE_KERNEL] = "online_kernel",
>> + [MMOP_ONLINE_MOVABLE] = "online_movable",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int memhp_online_type_from_str(const char *str)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>
> I would change it as:
>
> for (int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(online_type_to_str); i++) {
>
That's not allowed by the C90 standard (and -std=gnu89).
$ gcc main.c -std=gnu89
main.c: In function 'main':
main.c:3:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in
C99 or C11 mode
3 | for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
| ^~~
One of the reasons why
git grep "for (int "
will result in very little hits (IOW, only 5 in driver code only).
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists